William Cope
Pinakini Shah
Nadia Ayub
Miquel Colobran.png "Samuel Chukwuemeka Obasi")
Samuel Chukwuemeka Obasi
Sara RichterLearning, Knowledge and Human Development MOOC’s Updates
6. Productive Struggle in Learning (George Reese)
Comment: Educational psychology is also concerned with the dynamics of learning. In his contribution to this course, George Reese analyzes by way of example the notion of "productive struggle." How can educational psychology help us to understand the processes of learning?
Make an Update: Take one area of the learning sciences. How does educational psychology contribute to our understanding? What evidence does it offer? What interpretative concepts and theories does it provide?
Educational psychology helps us understand learning by explaining what happens when learners face challenges and how those challenges support growth. One area of the learning sciences where this is clear is productive struggle, as discussed by George Reese. Productive struggle refers to moments when learners experience difficulty but are still able to make progress with guidance and effort.
Educational psychology shows that learning is not always smooth or immediate. Research in cognitive psychology suggests that effortful learning leads to deeper understanding and better long-term retention compared to learning that feels easy or passive. For example, studies on desirable difficulties show that struggling with a problem before receiving the solution strengthens memory and problem-solving skills (Bjork & Bjork, 2011).
Theories such as constructivism and Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) help explain why productive struggle is effective. Learners build knowledge actively, and learning is most meaningful when tasks are slightly above their current level but supported by teachers or peers. This balance prevents frustration while still encouraging independent thinking.
Overall, educational psychology contributes evidence, concepts, and frameworks that help educators design learning experiences where struggle is seen not as failure, but as an essential part of the learning process.
Quantitative psychology can be very helpful for institutions because it allows them to analyze patterns and trends in learning and behavior. For example, schools can use it to see how well programs are working or to identify areas where students need more support. One of its biggest strengths is that it gives clear and reliable information that can guide decisions. However, it also has limits because it cannot capture the full complexity of human experience. Numbers alone do not show motivation, personal challenges, or context. To be most effective, quantitative methods should be combined with a deeper understanding of the people behind the data.
Productive Struggle refers to the process where learners engage with challenging tasks that are slightly beyond their current abilities, requiring effort, problem-solving, and reflection. George Reese emphasizes that such struggle is essential for deep learning, conceptual understanding, and the development of resilience and metacognitive skills. For it to be effective, tasks must be appropriately challenging, supported with guidance and feedback, and situated in a learning environment that normalizes mistakes as part of growth. Productive struggle transforms difficulty into an opportunity for meaningful learning rather than frustration.
Reference:
Reese, G. (n.d.). Productive Struggle in Learning. In Learning, Knowledge, and Human Development. University of Illinois. Coursera
George Reese's analysis of productive struggle is a perfect example of educational psychology in action, offering a conceptual tool to understand a critical learning dynamic.
The concept is rooted in established theories, primarily Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). Productive struggle occurs when a task is challenging but manageable—it's in the ZPD, requiring significant mental effort without being so difficult that it leads to frustration and disengagement.
Educational psychology helps us understand that learning is not just about acquiring information but also about how individuals engage with challenges during the learning process. George Reese’s concept of “productive struggle” highlights that a certain level of difficulty can actually promote deeper understanding. When students face challenges that are within their zone of proximal development—tasks that are neither too easy nor too hard—they are encouraged to think critically, persist, and develop problem-solving strategies.
Through the lens of educational psychology, we can see that productive struggle supports cognitive growth and metacognitive awareness, as learners actively reflect on their thinking and adjust their approaches. It also shows the importance of teacher support, such as scaffolding and feedback, to help students navigate difficulties without feeling overwhelmed. Overall, educational psychology provides valuable insight into how emotional resilience, motivation, and cognitive processes interact to make learning more meaningful and lasting.
Quantitative psychology helps institutions make data-driven decisions — for example, improving teaching methods, evaluating programs, and measuring student performance. Its strength lies in providing objective, measurable results. However, it can’t fully capture emotions, motivation, or context behind the numbers, which limits understanding of human behavior.
(Cohen et al., 2018)
An important application of quantitative methods is in psychometric testing, such as standardized exams that measure learning outcomes. These tools help identify trends, compare group performance, and guide policy decisions. While they offer reliability and scalability, they may overlook individual learning differences and cultural biases.
(Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2017)
Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M. E., & Sturman, E. D. (2018). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2017). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Quantitative psychology helps institutions make data-driven decisions — for example, improving teaching methods, evaluating programs, and measuring student performance. Its strength lies in providing objective, measurable results. However, it can’t fully capture emotions, motivation, or context behind the numbers, which limits understanding of human behavior.
(Cohen et al., 2018)
An important application of quantitative methods is in psychometric testing, such as standardized exams that measure learning outcomes. These tools help identify trends, compare group performance, and guide policy decisions. While they offer reliability and scalability, they may overlook individual learning differences and cultural biases.
(Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2017)
Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M. E., & Sturman, E. D. (2018). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2017). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Option #1 As an international teacher, I’ve often noticed that my students learn best when they are challenged just enough to think deeply but still feel supported. This experience connects closely to George Reese’s concept of productive struggle, which shows that learning happens most effectively when students work through difficulties rather than avoiding them.
Educational psychology helps me understand these learning processes by explaining how motivation, mindset, and emotions influence a student’s willingness to engage with challenging tasks. For example, I’ve had students who initially felt frustrated when faced with difficult lessons, but with the right guidance and encouragement, they began to see struggle as part of learning. By applying concepts like scaffolding and growth mindset, I’ve learned to give just the right amount of support so they can overcome obstacles and gain confidence in their abilities.
Through this lens, educational psychology doesn’t just explain how students learn—it also helps teachers like me create classroom environments that nurture resilience, curiosity, and lifelong learning.
Option #1
Educational psychology helps understand learning by studying the dynamics of how people thinks, feel and interact as we gain knowledge. It provides a scientific theories and concpets that explain how cognitive works and motivation, like how george reeese analyze the idea of productive struggle and it shows that learning isnt about getting the right answer quickly but the essential growth that happens in students grapple with a challeging task with appropriate support. It also help teaches educator to build a deeper understanding and strong provlem solvings effective in aligning how the human mind naturally learns and develops.
Kristial offers a clear understanding of how educational psychology helps us grasp not only what students learn but also the cognitive processes behind it. She ties George Reese's concept of productive struggle to learning theory, explaining that learning requires students to face challenges that are tough but manageable with the right support. This approach aligns with educational psychology’s broader focus on cognitive development and motivation, emphasizing that learning involves growth through perseverance and challenge, rather than immediate success. From a TVL–Automotive perspective, such challenges can be integrated into practical scenarios, such as students troubleshooting complex diagnostic systems. As they grapple with these tasks, guided by clear scaffolding, they not only learn the technical skills but also develop persistence and problem-solving abilities. - @Kristial Angelie Viernes,
Kristial offers a clear understanding of how educational psychology helps us grasp not only what students learn but also the cognitive processes behind it. She ties George Reese's concept of productive struggle to learning theory, explaining that learning requires students to face challenges that are tough but manageable with the right support. This approach aligns with educational psychology’s broader focus on cognitive development and motivation, emphasizing that learning involves growth through perseverance and challenge, rather than immediate success. From a TVL–Automotive perspective, such challenges can be integrated into practical scenarios, such as students troubleshooting complex diagnostic systems. As they grapple with these tasks, guided by clear scaffolding, they not only learn the technical skills but also develop persistence and problem-solving abilities. - @Kristial Angelie Viernes,
Option #1
Metacognition, or thinking about thinking, is a crucial area in the learning sciences. Educational psychology provides valuable insights into how metacognitive processes influence learning.
- Contribution of Educational Psychology:
- Educational psychology helps us understand the cognitive and affective processes involved in metacognition, such as planning, monitoring, and evaluating one's learning.
- Evidence:
- Research shows that students who use metacognitive strategies (e.g., self-questioning, summarizing) perform better academically. Studies also highlight the importance of metacognitive awareness in problem-solving and critical thinking.
- Interpretive Concepts and Theories:
- Cognitive Load Theory: Metacognitive strategies can help learners manage cognitive load by selecting relevant information and using effective learning techniques.
- Self-Regulated Learning (SRL): Metacognition is a key component of SRL, where learners take control of their learning process by setting goals, monitoring progress, and adjusting strategies as needed.
- Attribution Theory: Understanding how students attribute their successes and failures can influence their motivation and metacognitive engagement.
@Angela May Mangahas, effectively discusses the importance of metacognition in educational psychology, emphasizing how students who actively plan, monitor, and evaluate their learning processes tend to perform better. The integration of Cognitive Load Theory and Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) is crucial in understanding how students manage the cognitive demands of complex tasks. For TVL–Automotive students, this concept can be applied by teaching them to self-monitor while conducting vehicle diagnostics, evaluating whether they’ve followed the correct procedure, and adjusting their approach as needed. By integrating metacognitive strategies, students will not only improve their technical knowledge but also develop critical thinking skills essential for real-world problem-solving.