I see an authentic education as when we talk about experience, and that is difficult to provide in the classroom, for education to be complete it is required that what is seen in school not only stays there, that it continues. watching and using it at home, because no matter how many real cases we wanted to give, being in the classroom and having a certain amount of time to explain the topic limits learning a bit.

• Lourdes Mejia

Comment:
The shift towards authentic education is fascinating, especially as it prioritizes a child-centered approach, aiming to connect learning with real-life experiences. However, it’s thought-provoking to consider whether this approach can truly impact a child's future opportunities. Does focusing on practicality sometimes limit students' potential by not challenging existing inequalities? It raises an important debate about whether authentic education can fulfill its promise of transformation or simply adapt to life’s realities without changing them.

Update:
The concept of authentic education aligns with current trends emphasizing experiential learning and real-world applications. For example, project-based learning and community engagement activities are now more common, allowing students to apply academic concepts in relevant contexts. Yet, despite these efforts, there remains a concern that authentic education may not address deeper social inequalities. This brings us back to a fundamental question: can this method empower students to change their life circumstances, or does it risk reinforcing them by focusing too heavily on immediate practicality?

• Flore Gilbuena

A standout idea from Authentic Education: More Last Times is the emphasis on real-world relevance in the curriculum. This approach encourages educators to connect lessons to students' lives and current social issues. Promote participation and deeper understanding With true integration of work and projects Students will be better prepared for the complexities of the world beyond the classroom. How do you think this shift towards authentic education affects student motivation and learning outcomes?

• Michael Asis

The shift to authentic pedagogy represents a meaningful departure from traditional, didactic education, emphasizing a more holistic, learner-centered approach. By focusing on practical, real-life applications and encouraging students to take an active role in their learning, authentic pedagogy fosters deeper understanding and critical thinking skills. This is a valuable progression, especially in promoting creativity and problem-solving, which are essential in real-world contexts.

However, the critique raised is valid: while authentic education can empower students intellectually and emotionally, it may not inherently level the playing field when it comes to life chances. If the educational system continues to operate within broader societal inequalities—such as disparities in access to resources, support, or opportunities—the effectiveness of authentic pedagogy in changing those circumstances may be limited. In this sense, it could be criticized for being too “practical” or focused on what can be realistically achieved within existing structures, rather than challenging those structures to address inequality directly.

To fulfill its promise, authentic education must not only foster individual growth but also seek to provide equal opportunities for all learners. Without addressing the systemic factors that perpetuate inequality, authentic pedagogy risks reinforcing the same barriers it seeks to dismantle. Thus, while its principles are sound, the movement’s broader societal impact may depend on how it is implemented and whether it actively works to challenge social and economic inequalities within and beyond the classroom.

• Ella Lane Garchitorena

The shift to authentic pedagogy represents a meaningful departure from traditional, didactic education, emphasizing a more holistic, learner-centered approach. By focusing on practical, real-life applications and encouraging students to take an active role in their learning, authentic pedagogy fosters deeper understanding and critical thinking skills. This is a valuable progression, especially in promoting creativity and problem-solving, which are essential in real-world contexts.

However, the critique raised is valid: while authentic education can empower students intellectually and emotionally, it may not inherently level the playing field when it comes to life chances. If the educational system continues to operate within broader societal inequalities—such as disparities in access to resources, support, or opportunities—the effectiveness of authentic pedagogy in changing those circumstances may be limited. In this sense, it could be criticized for being too “practical” or focused on what can be realistically achieved within existing structures, rather than challenging those structures to address inequality directly.

To fulfill its promise, authentic education must not only foster individual growth but also seek to provide equal opportunities for all learners. Without addressing the systemic factors that perpetuate inequality, authentic pedagogy risks reinforcing the same barriers it seeks to dismantle. Thus, while its principles are sound, the movement’s broader societal impact may depend on how it is implemented and whether it actively works to challenge social and economic inequalities within and beyond the classroom.

• Ella Lane Garchitorena

This module, particularly the references to authentic pedagogy, struck me deeply because I believe that this approach revolutionizes the traditional idea of learning. Authentic pedagogy does not merely transmit knowledge, but invites students to become active participants in their own learning process. The idea of constructivism, where students mentally construct their understanding through interactive activities such as research, experiments and projects, is particularly fascinating. This approach not only promotes a deeper understanding of concepts, but also greater responsibility and participation on the part of the students.
It seems to me that this type of pedagogy is in line with the modern needs of a society that demands active and participative citizens. The idea of participatory citizenship, where individuals are encouraged to actively engage in their role as citizens, is a concept that resonates deeply with me. I hope that this type of pedagogy can become more and more widespread in our schools, to train a generation of students who are more aware and active in society.
I was also struck by the insight into Rabindranath Tagore - a figure I love very much - and his school in Shantiniketan: https://newlearningonline.com/new-learning/chapter-2/supporting-material-1/rabindranath-tagores-school-at-shantiniketan
His critique of traditional pedagogy, which he considers ‘lifeless, colourless, dissociated from the context of the universe’ and which ‘kills the sensitiveness of the child mind’, is still very innovative today. The idea of creating a learning environment that is integrated with nature and that values hands-on experiences and manual activities is particularly fascinating. The description of how students at Shantiniketan learnt through activities such as caring for animals, growing fruit and vegetables, building objects from natural materials, and participating in discussions and projects, seems to me to be an extremely effective approach to developing skills and knowledge that go beyond the simple memorisation of facts and theorems.
Tagore's educational philosophy, which emphasises the importance of students' freedom and responsibility, and views education as a process of personal growth and development, seems to me particularly relevant to the modern world. His critique of traditional pedagogy, which considers ‘machine-made lessons’ and which ‘thwarts the growth of the child's mind’, is an important message for all educators and students.

• Maura Gancitano

I feel like for a lot of teachers this is the traditional method that feels comfortable for the teacher and still gives some control to the students. In the balance of time frames and restrictions in school Authentic education has become the norm. With younger year groups with less curriculum restrictions it is easy to move to more transformative teaching, but with older groups this becomes the balance of the rooming restrictions and the classroom space you have (some still don't have desks you can move), deadlines for assessments and coursework.

• Michelle Masters

In my experience as a teacher, I find myself aligning with the educational philosophies of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Maria Montessori. Their vision of natural, child-centered education resonates deeply with what I have observed in the classroom. As Rousseau suggested, I have seen that allowing students to learn at their own pace, through hands-on experiences, is far more effective than imposing rigid constraints. When given the freedom to actively participate in their own learning, students become not only more motivated, but also more autonomous and capable of critical thinking.

Inspired by Montessori's method, I have also experimented with creating an environment that encourages independent exploration. By placing the student at the center of the learning process, I have observed similar results to those Montessori described: learners take more initiative and actively engage in their own development. They no longer simply receive information; they seek it out, analyze it, and incorporate it into their daily lives.

These experiences have led me to adopt a more authentic pedagogy, where students are truly involved in the process of understanding, not just the content itself but also the purpose of learning and how it shapes their way of thinking.

• Hourya Khechai

Authentic Education: More Recent Times emphasizes a shift toward real-world, meaningful learning experiences that go beyond traditional academic content. In recent times, authentic education has focused on developing critical thinking, problem-solving, and practical skills that directly apply to students' lives and future careers. This approach seeks to make education more relevant, fostering deeper engagement by connecting classroom learning to real-world contexts and challenges. As education evolves, authenticity in teaching has become increasingly important in preparing students for a complex, rapidly changing world.

• Celeste Abarientos

Authentic Education: More Recent Times emphasizes a shift toward real-world, meaningful learning experiences that go beyond traditional academic content. In recent times, authentic education has focused on developing critical thinking, problem-solving, and practical skills that directly apply to students' lives and future careers. This approach seeks to make education more relevant, fostering deeper engagement by connecting classroom learning to real-world contexts and challenges. As education evolves, authenticity in teaching has become increasingly important in preparing students for a complex, rapidly changing world.

• Celeste Abarientos