William Cope
May Thet Khine Nyein
Obie Ellmoos.png "Nathan Luise")
Nathan Luise
Olive SabiitiAssessment for Learning MOOC’s Updates
Intelligence Tests: The First Modern Assessments (Admin Update 1)
Intelligence versus knowledge testing - what are the differences in assessment paradigm? A good place to begin to explore this distinction is the history of intelligence testing - the first modern form of testing:
And if you would lile to read deeper into a contemporary version of this debate, contrast Gottfredson and Phelps with Shenk in the attached extracts.
Shenk, The Genius in All of Us
Gottlebson and Phelps, Correcting Fallacies
Comment: What are the differences between testing intelligence and testing for knowledge? When might each approach be appropriate or innappropriate?
Make an Upate: Find an example of an intelligence test, and explain how it works. Analyze its strengths and weaknesses as a form of assessment.
Glyka Angel Raganas
Intelligence tests measure cognitive abilities like reasoning and problem-solving, suitable for assessing general potential or identifying learning disabilities, but inappropriate for evaluating specific knowledge or predicting success solely based on a single score. Conversely, knowledge tests assess understanding of specific information, ideal for evaluating learning in a subject or determining competence in a skill, but unsuitable for predicting future potential beyond the tested domain or equating knowledge with overall intelligence. The appropriate choice depends on the assessment's purpose, with a balanced approach often providing a more comprehensive evaluation.@Yasin Sancak,
Glyka Angel Raganas
Intelligence tests measure cognitive abilities like reasoning and problem-solving, suitable for assessing general potential or identifying learning disabilities, but inappropriate for evaluating specific knowledge or predicting success solely based on a single score. Conversely, knowledge tests assess understanding of specific information, ideal for evaluating learning in a subject or determining competence in a skill, but unsuitable for predicting future potential beyond the tested domain or equating knowledge with overall intelligence. The appropriate choice depends on the assessment's purpose, with a balanced approach often providing a more comprehensive evaluation.@Yasin Sancak,
Glyka Angel Raganas
Intelligence tests measure cognitive abilities like reasoning and problem-solving, suitable for assessing general potential or identifying learning disabilities, but inappropriate for evaluating specific knowledge or predicting success solely based on a single score. Conversely, knowledge tests assess understanding of specific information, ideal for evaluating learning in a subject or determining competence in a skill, but unsuitable for predicting future potential beyond the tested domain or equating knowledge with overall intelligence. The appropriate choice depends on the assessment's purpose, with a balanced approach often providing a more comprehensive evaluation.@Yasin Sancak,
Intelligence tests measure cognitive abilities like reasoning and problem-solving, suitable for assessing general potential or identifying learning disabilities, but inappropriate for evaluating specific knowledge or predicting success solely based on a single score. Conversely, knowledge tests assess understanding of specific information, ideal for evaluating learning in a subject or determining competence in a skill, but unsuitable for predicting future potential beyond the tested domain or equating knowledge with overall intelligence. The appropriate choice depends on the assessment's purpose, with a balanced approach often providing a more comprehensive evaluation.@Yasmine Bey,
In short, Tesing Intelligence tests a person's ability while Testing for Knowledge tests what a person has learned. Knowledge testing fits academic or skill assessments but can't evaluate learning potential. Each is inappropriate if used outside its intended purpose.
Mengukur kecerdasan dan mengukur pengetahuan memiliki tujuan yang berbeda dalam sistem evaluasi pendidikan. Tes kecerdasan seperti Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) dirancang untuk menilai kemampuan kognitif seserorang, termasuk keterampilan dalam memecahkan masalah dan belajar tentang hal-hal baru. Tes ini lebih menyoroti potensi intelektual bawaan individu daripada pengetahuan yang telah diperoleh. Berbanding sebaliknya, tes pengetahuan berfungsi untuk mengukur seberapa baik seseorang memahami dan mengingat materi yang telah diajarkan, pada umumnya melalui ujian standar, kuis, atau bentuk penilaian akademik lainnya. Tes ini memberikan gambaran tentang pemahaman siswa terhadap suatu mata pelajaran dan sejauh mana mereka dapat mengaplikasikan informasi tersebut dalam konteks pendidikan.
Pemilihan metode evaluasi bergantung pada tujuan dan kebutuhan tertentu. Tes kecerdasan sering digunakan untuk mengidentifikasi individu yang memerlukan layanan pendidikan khusus atau sebagai alat penelitian dalam memahami kapasitas kognitif seseorang. Namun, jika digunakan untuk memberi label atau membatasi individu berdasarkan skor yang diperoleh, tes ini dapat menimbulkan masalah, terutama karena adanya kemungkinan bias budaya yang memengaruhi hasilnya. Sementara itu, tes pengetahuan membantu mengukur kemajuan siswa dan efektivitas kurikulum, tetapi terkadang dapat terlalu menekankan aspek hafalan daripada pengembangan keterampilan berpikir kritis. Oleh karena itu, penting untuk memilih metode evaluasi yang sesuai dengan tujuan yang ingin dicapai, dengan mempertimbangkan kelebihan dan keterbatasan masing-masing pendekatan agar hasil yang diperolah lebih akurat dan adil
@Maria Vanesha,@Ardelia Indriani Putri,@Firda Rizqa Istianah,
The difference between testing intelligence and testing for knowledge is in their use. Intelligence testing is used to measure cognitive abilities such as reasoning, problem-solving, and abstract thinking. while testing for knowledge is used to assess acquired information, facts, and learned skills. intelligence testing is used for Hiring for a Problem-Solving Role, while testing for knowledge is used for Assessing a Student's Readiness for Advanced Studies.
The advantages and disadvantages of the two test tools are:
Strengths of Testing Intelligence:
Measures Cognitive Abilities Beyond Memorization
Predicts Potential and Learning Ability
Useful for evaluating critical thinking and creativity.
Strengths of Testing Knowledge:
Measures Subject Mastery
Useful for Certifications and Competency-Based Evaluations
Weaknesses of Testing Intelligence:
Lacks Contextual Knowledge
Weaknesses of Testing Knowledge:
Does Not Assess Critical Thinking or Problem-Solving
@Padma Aulia,@Firda Rizqa Istianah,@Rifki Ariyanto,@Ajeng Citra Larassati Ajeng,
The difference between testing intelligence and testing for knowledge is in their use. Intelligence testing is used to measure cognitive abilities such as reasoning, problem-solving, and abstract thinking. while testing for knowledge is used to assess acquired information, facts, and learned skills. intelligence testing is used for Hiring for a Problem-Solving Role, while testing for knowledge is used for Assessing a Student's Readiness for Advanced Studies.
The advantages and disadvantages of the two test tools are:
Strengths of Testing Intelligence:
Measures Cognitive Abilities Beyond Memorization
Predicts Potential and Learning Ability
Useful for evaluating critical thinking and creativity.
Strengths of Testing Knowledge:
Measures Subject Mastery
Useful for Certifications and Competency-Based Evaluations
Weaknesses of Testing Intelligence:
Lacks Contextual Knowledge
Weaknesses of Testing Knowledge:
Does Not Assess Critical Thinking or Problem-Solving
@Padma Aulia,@Firda Rizqa Istianah,@Rifki Ariyanto,@Ajeng Citra Larassati Ajeng,
Sure
tes intelegensi: tes intelegensi adalah tes yang digunakan untuk menguji dan mengukur tingkat kecerdasan individu. Termasuk mengetahui potensi, dan mengetahui kelebihan kekurangan individu. tes intelegensi dapat mengukur Seperti kemampuan analitik, pemecahan masalah, kemampuan berpikir logis dan lain sebagainya. tes intelegensi juga bisa digunakan untuk menemukan minat dan bakat individu.
Tes pengetahuan: Mengukur kemampuan tau pengetahuan seseorang dalam suatu bidang
Intelligence tests measure how well a person can think, solve problems, and handle new situations. These tests don't ask for specific facts but instead check skills like logical thinking, memory, and pattern recognition. For example, an IQ test might have puzzles or number sequences to see how quickly someone can figure things out. The goal is to measure how a person processes and applies information rather than what they already know.
Knowledge tests, on the other hand, check what a person has learned over time. These tests focus on facts and information, like history dates, science concepts, or vocabulary. A school exam is a good example since it tests understanding of a subject rather than overall thinking ability.
Each type of test is useful in different situations. Intelligence tests help identify problem-solving skills, learning abilities, and cognitive strengths but don't measure expertise in a specific subject. Knowledge tests are good for checking education and training but don't show how well someone can think critically or adapt. If the wrong type of test is used, the results can be misleading. A person might seem less capable just because they weren't tested in a way that fits their actual skills.
@Ardelia Indriani Putri, @Firda Rizqa Istianah, @Maria Vanesha
Completely agree