Abstract
This paper examines how language is strategically used in media coverage of conflict, and how such use can influence the way audiences understand and react to unfolding events. It highlights the role of discursive strategies in shaping public opinion, sometimes guiding audiences toward particular perspectives. The discussion focuses on key techniques such as framing, passivization, presupposition, lexical choice, and selective quoting, which are often used to subtly insert bias, obscure responsibility, or reinforce certain narratives. These strategies tend to reflect the broader political or institutional goals of the media outlets involved, and they can significantly affect how conflict is perceived on a collective level. Finally, the research emphasizes the importance of encouraging media literacy and critical awareness, especially in times of crisis. Understanding how language can be used to mislead or manipulate is essential for both researchers and the general public in navigating today’s complex media landscape.
Presenters
Wael NelPhD Candidate, Communication and Media Studies Department, Charles III University of Madrid, Spain
Details
Presentation Type
Paper Presentation in a Themed Session
Theme
Communications and Linguistic Studies
KEYWORDS
Conflict discourse, Media coverage, Language and power
