Abstract
This research analyzes the long-term impact of political viewpoints on the environmental nonprofit sector. The focus is on the differences and similarities among nonprofits operating in politically conservative and politically liberal state environments. Specifically, the study explores how the political climate of a state influences the mission, goals, and support systems of environmental nonprofits. It examines how these organizations are affected by state government policies, particularly in terms of formation, funding, and operational execution. The study compares environmental nonprofits in the conservative state of Florida to those in the liberal state of California. Key questions explored include: How do nonprofits’ missions align with or resist the prevailing political ideologies? What are the differences in how nonprofits receive funding in different political climates, particularly regarding public and private sector support? Finally, the study assesses the role of state governments in shaping the strategic goals and operational effectiveness of these organizations. Through interviews, case studies, and a comparative policy analysis across several states, the research provides insights into how political environments affect environmental nonprofits’ missions, strategies, and sustainability, offering valuable recommendations for nonprofit leaders and policymakers.
Presenters
Maya LisStudent, Society and Environment: US Environmental Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States
Details
Presentation Type
Theme
Technical, Political, and Social Responses
KEYWORDS
Comparative Environmental Regimes, Regulatory Impact, Nonprofit Environmentalism, Public-Private Funding Paradigms
